For those who watched last week’s very special episode of Black-ish, the opening of this week’s The People vs. O.J. Simpson feels exquisitely timed. In the Black-ish episode, titled “Hope,†the family gathers around the TV as the police shooting of an unarmed black man fails to yield an indictment and the community rises up in protest. All parents of small children are naturally inclined to protect them from the terrible realities of the world, but the news forces Dre and Bow to face a difficult question specific to African-Americans: How (and when) do you tell your kids about racial injustice and police brutality?
In the early ’80s, Johnnie Cochran had already had that conversation with his girls — or at least the part about how to deal with the police. As “The Race Card†opens, we flash back to 1982, when Cochran, then an assistant district attorney, gets stopped for the offense of being a black man driving through an affluent white neighborhood. This is the third time in a week he’s been pulled over, and we see it as a ritual humiliation. Cochran is cuffed, face down on the hood of his car, while white passersby stare at him. He issues a reminder to his kids:
“What do we say to the police?â€
“Nothing.â€
“And who talks to the police?â€
“Our lawyer.â€
For the upwardly mobile families in Black-ish and The People vs. O.J. Simpson, wealth is no insulation from injustice or police harassment. And for Cochran specifically, misbehavior from the LAPD is less the exception than the norm.
As I wrote last week, one of the better qualities of The People vs. O.J. Simpson is its generous perspective on Cochran and Marcia Clark, who each faced intense criticism during the trial. Christopher Darden’s line about Cochran being the preacher who goes to church every Sunday is key: There’s a degree to which Cochran is exploiting attitudes about the LAPD’s institutional racism to get his client off, given O.J.’s “Mayor of Brentwood†status and his distance from the black community, but those attitudes are deeply ingrained. As he tells the defense team, the case won’t be won on evidence: “Jurors go with the narrative that makes sense. We’re here to tell a story. Our job is to tell that story better than the prosecution tells theirs.â€
Frankly, the story O.J.’s team is telling is conspiratorial and convoluted, less believable on its face than the story the prosecution plans to tell. Clark and Darden will argue that the murders were the culmination of a pattern of abuse and obsession, and they’ll follow the trail of blood from Nicole Brown’s house to the white Bronco to O.J.’s estate. They have a motive and a “mountain of evidence.†Cochran and Co. are citing technicalities on the handling of evidence and arguing that people like Det. Mark Fuhrman made a “rush to judgment,†if they didn’t set up O.J. entirely. That’s an uphill argument, but Cochran is a superior storyteller and he’s confident that his story, based on personal experience, will be persuasive enough to cast reasonable doubt on his client’s guilt.
The title of the episode is significant, too. While the term “the race card†is associated with Cochran and O.J.’s defense strategy, the prosecution was also playing the same game — and less nimbly. “The Race Card†may begin with Cochran, but it throws much of the focus on Darden, who’s watching the opportunity of a lifetime turn into an unending torment. Darden’s addition to the prosecution team comes as a result of Garcetti’s order to “stir in a little flavor,†and it leaves him in a precarious spot on at least three fronts. For one, he will be perceived, not unfairly, as getting the job based on the color of his skin. For Darden, this recalls painful memories of law school in the ’70s, when other students looked at him as an affirmative-action beneficiary, rather than someone who deserved the spot. Then, with O.J. enjoying broad public support in the black community, pre-trial hearings get Darden cast as an “Uncle Tom.â€
The third reason is the thorniest: The prosecution needs Darden to make a dodgy witness more credible. The show dances around this awkward proposition beautifully. Darden knows why he’s been assigned to Fuhrman, the abhorrent racist who happened to find the bloody glove on O.J.’s estate. He can raise objections with Clark, but without much leverage, given his fresh (and therefore tenuous) appointment to the trial of the century. The most likely result, based on the response to his pre-trial motion to keep “the n-word†out of the proceedings, is that Cochran would expose his role for what it is. When Cochran whispers to Darden, “Whatever happens, don’t do Fuhrman. Make the white people do him,†it’s not entirely self-serving. It’s wise counsel that Darden takes to heart.
Darden eventually gets out of questioning Fuhrman, after a couple of sessions raise his suspicion. (Closing the episode with Fuhrman standing over a gleaming case of Nazi memorabilia is a pulpy affirmation of his earlier dog-whistle racism.) But the the prosecution’s questionable faith in Darden lingers, especially with regards to his relationship to Clark, who is his strongest advocate. It’s Clark who suggests he be promoted to co-prosecutor after William Hodgman is hospitalized with chest pains, and Darden clings poignantly to her faith in him. Sterling K. Brown plays Darden as a bundle of anxiety and self-doubt, buoyed by Clark’s support, but rightly dubious of it, too, given his symbolic value as part of the team. Darden is there to tell black jurors — in the courtroom and in living rooms nationwide — that it’s okay to convict O.J. Simpson. That’s a lonely, thankless role to play.
Dancing Itos:
- As Cochran takes over the defense, it’s been funny to see Shapiro wrapped up in petty slights, like when he dramatically refuses to enter a meeting because of F. Lee Bailey’s possible leaks to the tabloids. The makers of The People vs. O.J. Simpson have taken a clear side on the defense team infighting.
- Clark counts 62 instances of O.J. beating, degrading, or stalking Nicole. It’s remarkable, in retrospect, how little traction this pattern of domestic violence gained with the jury.
- Dominick Dunne followed the O.J. Simpson case for Vanity Fair and kept on following it for 13 years, through the civil trial and the armed robbery that accounts for Simpson’s current prison stint. He would become O.J.’s most persistent nemesis in the press, and the trial’s most evocative chronicler. It’ll be interesting to see if the series treats him as anything other than a collector of gossip, but if that route yields more scenes like the one where Lance Ito shows him an autographed picture of Arsenio Hall, it’ll be worth it.
- “I would be remiss if I didn’t respond to my good friend, Mr. Darden.†With those words, Cochran opens up a crater in Mr. Darden’s stomach.
- Neither of the crime scenes tell a story, at least not one that serves the prosecution. The clearing-away of Nicole Brown’s house — which had been up for sale, but had yet to find a buyer for obvious reasons — and the “homey†staging of O.J.’s estate naturally made her place seem sterile and his wholesome and lived-in. Once again, the prosecution has been outplayed.