New York subscribers got exclusive early access to this story in our Gold Rush newsletter. Sign up here to get it in your inbox.
The awards-season villain is almost as important as the ceremony itself. Itâs a galvanizing force for people who pay attention to awards races, helping to provide at least one overarching narrative for what might otherwise seem like a chaotic and haphazard competition. The Oscars always have a villain â sometimes more than one. Vultureâs own Nate Jones has extensively chronicled the journeys of the designated Oscar villains over the years, coming up with a handy rubric to determine why Bradley Cooperâs hyperearnest immersion into a subject is good for A Star Is Born but villainous in Maestro.
Nateâs three-pronged criteria for awards villainy is perfectly calibrated for the Oscars, but to suit the Emmys, we need to make a few tweaks. An Oscar villain (either a film or a singular performance) usually needs to have debuted to much acclaim at one of the fall festivals and immediately get pegged by awards-watchers as a major Best Picture contender. There is no festival season from which Emmy contenders can emerge with the kind of hype that ultimately leads to a backlash. But we can make the argument that critical hype for previous seasons of Emmy-nominated shows, along with prior TV Academy recognition, is a comparable metric and amounts to Major Contender status for past juggernauts like Succession.
After the festivals, Nate explains that Oscar villains often go on to premiere to a divisive reaction among the actual viewing public. But crucially, they retain âthe imprimatur of awards-season success,â and âa consensus emerges among detractors that the film needs to be taken down a peg.â This can also happen to TV shows, when a critical consensus emerges early only for viewers at home to start piling on the Anointed One once theyâve had a chance to binge it. Furthermore, Oscar villains can catch flack for failing to meet not just artistic standards but political ones too. âOften, this opinion emerges from a disparity in values between Twitter progressivism and Hollywood progressivism, and while you can absolutely make valid critiques of both, only one of them gave Best Picture to Green Book.â The Emmys donât have a Green Book in their history books, but they did give Outstanding Drama to 24 five seasons into its run.
With all this in mind, letâs count down the contenders for 2024 Emmy villain:
10.
David Zaslav
If youâre watching the Emmys this year and wondering where the usual bevy of HBO shows are, David Zaslav is the man youâre looking for. Boiled down to its essence, an Emmy villain first needs to hold some perceived power, and as the CEO of Warner Bros. Discovery, he certainly qualifies. His status as an avatar of the studios during the WGA and SAG-AFTRA strikes and his role in annihilating projects like Batgirl and Coyote vs. ACME, in addition to that $49.7 million salary he collected in 2023, have turned him into the suit at whom you want to throw tomatoes. The one thing keeping him from the No. 1 spot on this list is that itâs hard to grasp any one specific thing heâs responsible for at this yearâs Emmys. âHBOâs general downturnâ is definitely his fault, but itâs both too big and too vague a notion to support a villain narrative.
9.
RuPaulâs Drag Race
The Reality TV categories make for great Emmy villains because the same shows keep winning, and nothing cultivates awards-show villainy better than a carbon-copied winners list year after year. Drag Race has won Outstanding Reality Competition five out of the last six years, a span of time in which the extended Drag Race universe has become so massive with international iterations and All-Stars seasons and âLuxembourg Versus the Worldâ specials that a certain level of exhaustion kicked in. And with new blood like The Traitors entering the category, you could see a scenario where Drag Race becomes the entrenched old villain keeping the upstart young show down. Thereâs also the fact that RuPaul himself has always been low-key politically problematic, what with the fracking and all. Ultimately, though, Drag Race remains too popular and drag itself too politically under fire from the MAGA crowd to ever truly fit the bill.
8.
Meryl Streep
Itâs less of a thing now that the line between movies and TV has blurred beyond recognition. But an actress of Meryl Streepâs stature still retains the status of movie star, which means she does unavoidably seem like sheâs slumming it when she gets nominated for an Emmy. It feels like Streep has an unfair advantage in Supporting Actress in a Comedy because itâs assumed that Emmy voters will be dazzled by the Worldâs Finest Actress. Whatâs keeping Meryl from being a true Emmy villain is twofold: For one, her performance in Only Murders in the Building was great and critically lauded; for another, once the new season of Hacks premiered and Hannah Einbinderâs Emmy campaign began in earnest, she subsumed Merylâs status as front-runner. Itâs tough to mark someone as the villain when theyâre not the center of the conversation.
7.
Robert Downey Jr.
RDJ has all the movie-star cachet of Meryl Streep â perhaps even more so, since Streepâs reputation is Actress Extraordinaire while Downey is the center of Marvelâs billion-upon-billion-dollar superhero enterprise. But while Streepâs performance was well received, Downeyâs turn as multiple characters in The Sympathizer was more divisive among critics, many of whom found it showy bordering on showboaty. And, as our Roxana Hadadi noted, the fact that heâs a white nominee from a show about a Northern Vietnamese man struggling to live revolutionary ideals is an eyebrow-raiser. Heâs also just coming off of an Oscar win, which checks the âpre-hypedâ box on his villain scorecard. But while The Sympathizer might not have Emmy watchers hooting and hollering for RDJ to get another trophy, his Oscar win did represent a wave of goodwill for the actor, and itâs hard to imagine an en masse turn on him so quickly. I suppose you could cast a win for Downey Jr. as a slight to the late Treat Williams, nominated for Capote vs. the Swans, but thatâs about as heated as things could get.
6.
Baby Reindeer
The fact that Netflixâs massively popular limited series became the front-runner as soon as ShĹgun switched to Drama makes it the tall poppy of the Limited Series categories. But itâs the persistence of the lawsuits against the show alleging defamation from the woman who says sheâs the inspiration for its stalker character that could make the villain label stick. Working in Baby Reindeerâs favor is the fact there isnât really a plucky rooting interest among its competition. True Detective: Night Country was too divisive, Fargo too long in the tooth, Ripley too chilly. An Emmy villain needs a corresponding Emmy hero, and Lessons in Chemistry sure ainât it.
5.
The Morning Show
Okay, now weâre talking. The Morning Show pretty much jumps off of the page as an Emmy villain after even a cursory glance at the nominees. Itâs everywhere. Four of the seven Supporting Actress in a Drama nominees. Three of the seven Supporting Actors. Jennifer Aniston and Reese Witherspoon in Lead Actress?? All for a show that is objectively bonkers. But after three seasons, The Morning Show has turned âbonkersâ into a term of endearment from its oft-bewildered viewers. And while its politics have always been somewhat goofy, the worst label you can pin to it is âgirlboss television,â and in the year of Kamala, a lotta folks are gonna let the girlboss stuff slide for a few months.
4.
The Daily Show/Jon Stewart
Speaking of politics! You could write a tome about the history of The Daily Show as it pertains to American political and civic discourse from the time Jon Stewart took over hosting duties in 1999 until now. And like many things that were lauded as heroes of the left during the George W. Bush administration, time has turned TDS and especially Stewart into avatars of the derided center-left. When Stewart returned to the show in early 2024, he did so as a far more divisive figure, and when Last Week Tonight With John Oliver departed the Talk Series category for Scripted Variety in 2023, The Daily Show resumed its former trend of domination in the category. One imagines the fans of Jimmy Kimmel Live!, Late Night With Seth Meyers, and The Late Show With Stephen Colbert are hoping voters might try something new (not to mention those of us who wanted John Mulaney Presents: Everybodyâs in L.A. or Hot Ones to give this category the shake-up it so desperately needs).
3.
Hannah Einbinder
To be perfectly clear, Hacks is a far more popular series in the greater entertainment landscape than it is within the halls of Vulture. Any attempts to affix the villain label on that show would be erroneous. That said, within the context of awards, the dread specter of âcategory fraudâ often presages villain status. This doesnât just pertain to what does and doesnât count as a comedy but also who does and doesnât count as a lead or supporting performer. For each of Hacksâs three seasons, Hannah Einbinder has been submitted and nominated in Outstanding Supporting Actress in a Comedy, despite being a textbook co-lead with Jean Smart. Sheâs arguably more of a lead than Smart, since Ava is the POV through which we enter Deborahâs world in the series. Running in the Supporting category puts Einbinder at an advantage since she has more story (and thus more material) to work with. Fraudulence in order to gain an advantage? Thatâs textbook villainy too. Dulling Einbinderâs case for premier Emmy villain is the fact that despite the category fraud, she still lost her two previous nominations (to Ted Lassoâs Hannah Waddingham in 2021 and Abbott Elementaryâs Sheryl Lee Ralph in 2022), though most Emmy observers give her the best odds to finally win this year.
2.
The Crown
Well, for one thing, it is exceedingly easy to cast the British royals in the role of villains in almost any setting, which automatically shoots The Crown up toward the top of our ranking. Even if ShĹgun is predicted to win Outstanding Drama, The Crown still feels like an incumbent front-runner simply because this is its sixth nomination and it previously won in 2021. The show is seen as both past its prime (nobody seemed to like that final season very much) and politically problematic. Not to mention that Peter Morgan has long been accused of writing an apologia for the royal family, and the show came under repeated criticism for treating Diana unfairly in its final years.
1.
The Bear
If one show checks off all the boxes for Nateâs criteria, itâs The Bear. Letâs revisit:
1. The TV show is usually building off multiple seasons of acclaim, including previous Emmy nominations.
Not only did The Bear dominate the Comedy categories at last yearâs Emmys, winning Outstanding Comedy Series, Lead Actor (Jeremy Allen White), Supporting Actress (Ayo Edebiri), Supporting Actor (Ebon Moss-Bachrach), Writing, and Directing, it also picked up four SAG Awards, four Golden Globes, five Critics Choice Awards, two Independent Spirit Awards, two Producers Guild Awards, one Directors Guild Award, and a Peabody.
2. The show premieres to a divisive reaction among the public. But crucially, it retains the imprimatur of awards-season success. A consensus emerges among detractors that the show needs to be taken down a peg.
An emerging consensus that the show has to be taken down a peg? Check. One of the telltale signs of a backlash is that much of the tone adopts a âletâs all stop lying to ourselves and admit this thing is badâ narrative, and thatâs exactly the tone that has pervaded reviews of The Bear season three.
3. There is the sense that the show is bad not just on an artistic level, but on a political one as well.Â
On the surface, this condition wouldnât seem to apply to The Bear. While the show has been dinged since its earliest days for having a blinkered or inaccurate depiction of its Chicago environs, that tends to matter most to critics from Chicago. But politics donât always have to be national or even municipal, and I would argue that one of the biggest political questions within the TV industry right now is âDoes The Bear qualify as a comedy?â. Our own Kathryn VanArendonk tackled this very question earlier this week, and itâs at the center of The Bearâs candidacy for Emmy villain status. For one thing, it has the sheen of fraud to it; thereâs a sense that FX or The Bearâs producers are trying to get away with something by passing off the show as something itâs not to get ahead in the Emmys race. The Bear is a fraudulent comedy, goes this narrative, and anybody who says different is lying to you or to themselves.
This is a debate that surfaces every time the Golden Globes nominate a light drama in their comedy categories (some people are legit still mad about The Martian beating out Spy and Trainwreck in 2016), and it definitely comes up every time a half-hour series with heavy themes and dramatic execution gets nominated as a comedy at the Emmys. Showtime spent the better part of ten years making shows like Weeds, United States of Tara, and Nurse Jackie, all of which drove fans of ârealâ comedies up the wall. Thereâs also the not-inconsiderable fact that social media is about 90 percent comedy writers, and they all get really mad when âseriousâ comedies are seen as better than comedies that only want to make you laugh. That resentment tends to simmer behind the scenes and in private conversations, but when it finally starts to bubble up in frustrated tweets, like this one from an Abbott Elementary writer, you know that villain status has been achieved.
So The Bear is this yearâs Emmy villain. The follow-up question, then, is this: So what? What does that mean for its chances to win? Oscar villains occasionally triumph (Green Book, Crash), but they usually donât. La La Land fell to Moonlight, Avatar to The Hurt Locker, 1917 to Parasite. The thing about the Emmys is that the villain triumphs kind of a lot. Kind of all the time. Modern Family was an Emmy villain as early as its second season, and it won Outstanding Comedy four more times. Ted Lassoâs backlash-laden second season? More like Emmy-winning backlash-laden second season. Game of Thronesâs maligned final season: Emmy winner.
No one is expecting the frustration over The Bearâs category placement or the reviews for its third season to dampen voter enthusiasm for it, which will only enhance its villainy more. Disgruntled critics and social-media haters alike will be all the more vocally supportive of folks like What We Do in the Shadowsâs Matt Berry or Comedy Series nominees like Reservation Dogs (a funnier show than The Bear but certainly one that also combines comedy and drama in a way that defies any calls for pure laughs in the category). And when The Bear wins anyway, they will boo and snark and tweet about what a laugh riot Carmyâs latest meltdown was.
More From This Series
- Oscar Season Kicks Off With Trump Impressions and a Bond Tease
- How Every Oscar Movie Can Be the Anti-Trump Movie
- Are Netflix Normies Ready for Emilia PĂŠrez?