Summary of complaint
We received complaints from people who feel the BBC investigation into Rachel Reevesâ employment history, and our subsequent reporting of its findings, was biased against Ms Reeves.
Our response
Rachel Reeves has often cited her past employment when explaining why she has the credentials to be Chancellor of the Exchequer, one of the most senior roles in government. There have been questions raised previously over Ms Reevesâ career history, which prompted BBC News to investigate this matter further. Given Ms Reeves is in charge of the nationâs finances, this is an issue of public interest, which we reported proportionately, along with several other stories, including the war in Ukraine, President Trumpâs plans for trade tariffs, and a car attack in Munich.
When reporting on the inaccuracies in Ms Reevesâ CV on her LinkedIn profile, and her alleged breaches of expenses policy while working at Halifax Bank of Scotland (HBOS), we were transparent about the information we had established and the details we didnât know. We made clear that we had found no evidence that the HBOS investigation into Ms Reevesâ use of expenses was completed, and that there was no suggestion that her departure from the bank was because of this investigation.
We have reflected Ms Reevesâ position throughout our coverage, and heard from other senior Labour figures expressing support for her, including the prime minister. As our audience would expect, we have also included the response from Ms Reevesâ political opponents.Â
We believe our approach to this story has been appropriate, duly impartial and fair, reflecting the nuances, and examining the implications for public trust and perceptions of Rachel Reevesâ judgment.Â