No Partey, no party? What the stats saypublished at 14:57
Nicola Pearson
BBC Sport journalist

"A big miss", "an anchor" and "crucial".
That has been just some of the reaction from pundits, former players and reporters on the impact of Thomas Partey's absence in Arsenal's 1-0 semi-final, first leg defeat at home by Paris St-Germain on Tuesday.
The 31-year-old missed the match having picked up a cheap yellow card late on against Real Madrid in the last round that took him to three for this season's competition and a one-game suspension.
With fellow midfielder Jorginho out through injury and Mikel Merino having been used as a forward in recent weeks, it meant a reshuffle of players and positions for boss Mikel Arteta.
The effect of that was evident, with PSG controlling midfield while Declan Rice was forced to sit deeper, and Martin Odegaard and Bukayo Saka struggling to have the impact in attack that they are capable of.
Barring any fitness issues, Partey should return to the line-up for the return leg in Paris next Wednesday.
However, despite Tuesday night's difficulties, how much do the Gunners miss Partey when he is not in the team?
The statistics suggest it may not be as much those watching perceive.
According to Opta, across all competitions over the past two seasons, Arsenal have played 50 matches with Partey starting and 55 without.
With 31 and 33 wins respectively, the win percentage with and without is very similar, with the figures slightly favouring him starting at 62% compared to 60%.
However, when looking at numbers for goals scored and conceded, the average is ever so slightly higher for times they hit the back of the net when he does not start, at 2.2, compared to times he does (two). And, similarly, they average letting fewer goals in (0.8) without him than with him (0.9).
The side also tend to average more shots without him starting (15.9 without vs 14.2 with per game) and shots faced at 10 when starting and 8.4 when on the bench.
While the stats might show little difference whether the Gunners start with or without Partey, what can be harder to quantify is what a player like the Ghana international brings in experience in big games and balance to the side.
So, how do you feel about Partey's absence? Was he the missing cog or were the issues bigger than the one player? How important will his return be for the second leg? Will he be the catalyst for a memorable comeback?
