Portland, weâre told, is a magical place, but nobody can say exactly why. Itâs cool, except it isnât at all; itâs already over, or is it on again? We havenât heard the latest. Defining Portland is pointless: The fact that you would care enough to do it means youâre already there. Portland is a real location. You can mail physical objects there. But itâs also a state of mind, a stage where fantasies of style proliferate without apparent end.
At first glance, it makes no sense why the 11th track on Drakeâs More Life should be titled âPortland.â True, the city is mentioned by featured artist Travis Scott, but only in passing as part of a scheme to get his girl to go snorkeling and to allow him, in a bizarre, Cronenberg-esque turn of phrase, access to her âorgans.â How can you snorkel in a city with no coastline? How can you surf with no waves? Only Travis Scott knows.
Meanwhile, the hook (and second verse) on âPortlandâ belongs to Quavo of the Migos; centered on a jaunty admonition against wave theft, Quavoâs counsel takes on an ironic zing, given the relationship between Drake and the Migos began when Drake borrowed Migosâ mixtape hit âVersaceâ for his own ends while jumping on the fashion the Atlanta trio inaugurated for triplet-based meters.
Thereâs something gleefully cavalier about warning against passing othersâ styles off as your own on a track with Drake and Travis Scott, two artists whose aesthetic, such as it is, is an ever-shifting collage of the aesthetics of others. Drake and Travis are real artists. They make actual hits and serious money. But theyâre also states of the imagination, curatorial platforms where fantasies of being stylish can substitute for style itself. Where else would they be, if not âPortlandâ? And why would anyone hold it against them, so long as the music is a joyful hoot and everyoneâs being properly paid?