When Wyatt Cenac left The Daily Show at the end of 2012, nothing seemed awry. Plenty of comic talents passed through the show for greener pastures, so it would take three years and a Marc Maron sit-down to bring out the truth: Cenacâs departure was more acrimonious than it seemed, a result of a heated racial exchange with his then-boss Jon Stewart. In the intervening years, Cenac returned to stand-up with his acclaimed Night Train show in Brooklyn; he acted in intriguing, shoestring-budget indies; and he even created a webseries about his superhero alter ego. He did a lot, and beneath the surface of each project, it seemed Cenac had more to offer. An astute comic potential waiting to be tapped.
Wyatt Cenacâs Problem Areas, which premiered last Friday on HBO, is that endeavor. Itâs a late-night program dissimilar to anything else on television: For ten episodes, Cenac and his vocationally eclectic team (including filmmaker Ezra Edelman, comedian Hallie Haglund, and journalist Emma Carmichael) hope to create a dialogue about policing in America. Much of the language on this polarizing subject is about the desire to communicate with people who think differently. If the pilot is any indicator, Problem Areas â with its snappy graphics, low-fi hip-hop instrumentals, and punchy one-liners â is that conversation.
When I spoke with Cenac by phone, he was trapped in his office after several rounds of press. He spoke candidly on the mission statement of his new show, his wild idea for future presidential debates, and what â if any â responsibility he has with this new platform on HBO.
In thinking about your body of work, I was surprised by the premiere of Problem Areas. It came across as vaguely earnest.Â
The thought with entering the late-night space was, âIf Iâm going to be in this space, what is it that personally I want to do?â I felt like Iâd spent five years railing against 24-hour news networks and Fox News and hypocritical politicians. It can become very exhausting, because a year in, two years in, three years in, you feel like youâre yelling at the same people, and in many cases you are yelling at and about the same people. Thereâs a certain level of hopelessness that you feel, so in approaching this show I thought, âIs there something I would want to talk about topically, but from an approach that doesnât give me that same feeling of burnout and exhaustion and futility? What if you focus on actually trying to do shit? And what does that look like?â
If it came off as earnest, Iâm sorry, and I mean that earnestly. [Laughs.]
You donât have to apologize. By âearnest,â perhaps I meant ânot entirely doom and gloom.â This whole season is about policing in America. Do you think people in 2018 are willing to have an honest conversation about this subject?
When you get it out of the polarized place that itâs in, I think so. And to me, whatâs been interesting about going to all the cities that we travel to is that you see thereâs more common ground than the national conversation will present. When you get people in those situations where youâre just talking and itâs personalized and not sensationalized, Iâve been surprised by how much common ground there is. And not in a way thatâs like, everybody is going to hold hands and automatically get along. Itâs amazing to talk with police officers where they recognize broken-windows-style policing isnât something that they want to engage in. Theyâll talk about why it makes their job harder and it doesnât actually benefit them or the society that theyâve been entrusted to protect. I think you have to get into the nuance of it to even begin to have any real conversation about it.
The nuance is the detailed work, though, and it reminds of this bit you had about Derek Jeter. He received 1 million votes to play in the MLB All-Star Game, while Michael Bloomberg, running for mayor, only received half-a-million votes. Then you say, âNew York City has 8 million people and most just forgot to vote.â This could describe our last presidential election. Do you think the biggest hurdle for us is laziness, ignorance, or just forgetfulness?
I donât think itâs laziness or forgetfulness. I think the reality is that the system constructed is frustrating to people. That joke was talking about how we vote in November, and how itâs an antiquated thing that we did for farmers who arenât even alive anymore. And you know, we vote on a Tuesday. Voting could be a week-long thing. We could stretch the voting process out from Sunday to Sunday at a time thatâs more reasonable for people. Thereâs so much that we can do with technology, but we still go back to the same antiquated ways to vote. Itâs depressing when itâs easier to vote for the All-Star Game because you can do it on your phone. Thatâs why so many people can vote for American Idol or reality-television stars. Whatâs sad is that we can have a reality-television performer for president, without incorporating the other aspects of reality television â like voting and voter engagement.
We should just adopt it all.
Maybe! Itâd be a different turnout if all the candidates for president â instead of having a debate where they just regurgitate talking points â they just had to eat a six-foot-long piece of sushi, where every foot had a wasabi chunk. I mean, people would definitely watch that debate.
Imagine the ratings.
The sad reality is that we have focused more on ratings than we have on voter engagement and public engagement. Imagine if we took the same market research that we put into making the best ad for a candidate, [but put it] into actually engaging with the public. Engaging with the public also means being responsive to the public. If you have a car, you tune it up, you replace the parts. You try to keep it in good shape. This country has tires that are shot, a bunch of engine problems, and rather than saying, âOkay, letâs maybe put some new parts in here,â we just keep putting gas in and driving forward.
It feels more like weâre driving in place. To make any progress, do you think youâll have to engage those who politically disagree with you? Namely, the Republican base.
Look, America is an apartment where we have millions of roommates. The chore wheel comes up and we all got to figure out how to do those chores. Thereâs no moving to Canada, thereâs no waiting for people to die, thereâs none of that shit. I think that engagement is local engagement. And while we do have millions and millions of people in this country, itâs not on any one person to change anyoneâs mind or to try to get people to be more empathetic. Itâs everyone sharing the load, and I think thatâs always the way itâs been. If you go into the conversation with respect, it doesnât have to be a shouting match. It doesnât have to be a pissing contest. It can just be a couple of people hopefully being curious and learning a little more about a perspective they maybe hadnât fully considered.
Jon Stewart was often asked, âWhat is your responsibility to the public? Are you a comedian or a journalist?â Aside from just that, what was your headspace going into this show? Do you feel responsibility here?
Iâve never been to journalism school. I walked past it a bunch when I was in college. That said, I have journalists who work on the show, and they work very hard to make sure that the stories weâre telling are accurate and well-researched and in-depth and compelling. It would be unfair to them for me to say that there isnât a level of journalism that we incorporate in making a show like this. That said, itâs also a TV show, and it is entertainment. Iâm a comedian, so I need to try to make stuff funny. The idea of a television show is to get people to continue to watch. I need to think about the business side of things and I need to think about the fact that Iâm on HBO, which is a network that sets a high bar for the type of programming that they put out.
But when it gets to whatever responsibility I feel that I have, I was talking to somebody last week because there was a police shooting in Crown Heights. A man was holding up a metal pipe that officers mistook for a gun and killed him. In the past when there have been police shootings â when I didnât have a show and I felt frustrated and I felt angry â I wanted to talk about this. Whatever gift I have, it appears to be the gift to say something ironic and maybe funny and pointed in a way thatâs different than somebody else. Eventually I turned to Twitter, which is a thing that I never really engaged with, and I found myself thinking about, âIn the aftermath of this tragedy, what can I tweet that I can say thatâs going to be something of import?â And there was never anything. Thereâs nothing I could tweet. Thereâs this Erykah Badu song, âTwinkle,â and at the very end of it, she has an actor reread Howard Bealeâs speech from Network, which is an amazing speech. That was the best I could do.
Now I have a television show, and if thereâs a responsibility, itâs that the me of a few years ago â the me that angrily sat there, not knowing what to say after Alton Sterling and Philando Castileâs deaths â I have a platform that guy didnât have. And so maybe I can use the platform to have conversations about things that did infuriate me or did frustrate me or that I did have questions about. It would be easy to make The Apprentice. Thatâs an easy show to make, but what am I saying with that? If Iâm going to put all this time and energy into making a thing, if Iâm going to ask all this time and energy of the people who have chosen to work in this building with me on this, then maybe I have a responsibility to do something more than The Apprentice.
Thatâs a pretty low bar.
Itâs a low bar.
You know, it seems like youâre a little skeptical of my intentions.
[Laughs.] I spent almost five years interviewing people for a TV show. Sometimes they thought they were in on the joke, and then weâd go and weâd cut it up and didnât realize what we were doing. I think on some level âŚ
Thereâs a chance Iâm making fun of you?
I donât know about that, but the minute I agree to do press, I recognize that I open myself up for it to be interpreted and incorporated into a narrative that you have control over. I accept that. Although thatâs not to say that I donât go in with some level of skepticism. Whether thatâs a press interview, a job interview, or meeting a waiter, I think thereâs always a level of skepticism. If you go to a restaurant and you ask the waiter, âWhat do you think is good?â and theyâre like, âOh, you know, I think the beef stroganoff is great,â thereâs a part of you thatâs putting trust in this personâs hands. You donât know if the waiter is just telling you that because they got a bunch of beef stroganoff theyâve got to move or if the waiter really believes that. The thing that anyone hopes for is that if theyâre misunderstood, they get a second opportunity to try to be understood, and that people will want to fuck with them and engage with them in a way that allows them to be understood.
Itâs just funny because with Problem Areas, youâre the waiter giving the recommendation.
But am I giving a recommendation, or am I just showing you the menu?
Youâre doing some kind of presentation, so people do have to trust you.
Yeah, Iâll give you that, but itâs also TV. Iâm not trying to walk away from responsibility or anything like that, but I think thereâs a bunch of people on TV who get trust simply for being on TV.
This may be too sincere of a question, so if it is, you can just tell me to shut up.
Iâll just hang up the phone. If itâs too sincere, Iâll hang up the phone.
Earlier, when were talking about the shooting of Alton Sterling, you said that perhaps speaking pointedly and ironically is a âgiftâ you possess. Do you think the show youâre doing now, six years removed from The Daily Show, is what youâre meant to do?
Hereâs what I will say. For me, this show feels like a culmination of a lot of things that I have done throughout my career that Iâm getting to put in one place. I have worked in animation on King of the Hill, Iâve worked in late night with The Daily Show, Iâve worked on single-camera stuff whether it was a movie or television, I have performed onstage. In putting this show together, I canât say whether itâs the thing I was meant to do. What I can say is it feels like a collage of all of the things that Iâve done to this point in my career. Itâs those things coming together in a way that I hope resonates with audiences, and that is interesting to people, and provides me the opportunity to keep doing it for as long as myself and the people in this building want to continue to do it.
Are you happy?
In general? In life? With my hair-care products?
Thatâs for you to say.
I mean, Iâll answer your question with a question: What is happiness? I feel like this is the part where the interview is like, âAnd then the two of them got really stoned and passed out on the beach. They were in different cities, so it was different beaches, but they were connected through Jungâs collective unconscious.â
The people reading this probably donât care about my happiness, but Iâm doing fine these days.
You donât know, man. You donât know. They might. I think when the seven people who write in the comments of this article, obviously three of them will be about âHow I made $100 in a week and you can too through some online internet scam.â Three of them will be that. And then at least one of those four will be someone saying, âYou know what, I care if Samâs happy.â But the other three will be like, âI donât give a shit about that dudeâs feelings.â
[Long pause.]
I should have followed all that up with, âDid you understand?â Just one more callback to the understand joke. And I didnât.
How much self-doubt is in each answer youâre giving?
I donât know if its self-doubt. I know that I meander, so sometimes I find myself making sure that I get back on the track, but then Iâm always looking to see if thereâs a joke. Iâm stuck in an office all day. I donât get to get in front of people and tell jokes as much, and the people in the building are sick of my jokes. Youâve got to get the laugh where you can. They donât like Uncle WyWyâs goofy pranks.
You made me laugh at least seven times, so thatâs something.
There are comments on some of my stand-up specials that are that exact same review. âHour-long special, it made me laugh seven times.â
This interview has been edited and condensed.