If youâre familiar with its source material, itâs easy to spend large portions of Jason Reitmanâs Saturday Night drawing mental comparisons. The story the movie tells â about the 90 minutes leading up to Saturday Night Liveâs 1975 premiere â is already the stuff of myth, which the movie draws inspiration from more than it seeks to re-create faithfully. But more distracting than the historical record is the fact that Saturday Night is either unwilling or unable to escape the influence of Aaron Sorkin.
The obvious comparison point is Studio 60 on the Sunset Strip, Sorkinâs 2006 NBC misfire chronicling the behind-the-scenes happenings at a live sketch-comedy show loosely based on SNL. Naturally, there are moments when both tackle similar subject matter. A scene in Saturday Night, for example, when Lorne Michaels (Gabriel LaBelle) corrects a crew member who uses the word âskitâ rather than âsketch,â calls to mind a famously melodramatic moment in Studio 60, when a showâs cast member tears into his well-meaning mother for committing the same faux pas. But echoes like this are trivial compared to the more obvious areas of overlap between Sorkinâs oeuvre and Saturday Night. The structural devices, aesthetic flourishes, and writing tics that Reitman and co-writer Gil Kenan crib â intentionally or otherwise â from Sorkin make the film a fascinating showcase for all of the latterâs screenwriting strengths and weaknesses. Here are six of Saturday Nightâs most glaring I-Canât-Believe-Itâs-Not-Sorkin-isms:
The âMinutes to Showtimeâ Framing Device
Given that Sorkin has written multiple television shows (Studio 60, The Newsroom, and Sports Night) and one movie (Being the Ricardos) set behind the scenes at television productions that tape and/or broadcast live, heâs used a frantic scramble to showtime on a number of occasions to create dramatic tension. This was the subtext of nearly every Studio 60 episode, which featured a visible countdown clock in head writer Matt Albieâs (Matthew Perry) office, constantly reminding the audience how much time was left before the big show. Reitman and Kenan mimic this framing device in Saturday Night, down to their use of a clock in interstitial title cards. The Sorkin adaptation the film feels tonally closest to, though, is 2015âs Steve Jobs, which plays out largely in the moments leading up to three of Jobsâs most famous keynote addresses. Thereâs a direct line between Jobs, backstage at the 1984 Macintosh unveiling event, unsympathetically yelling at his engineers about the computerâs malfunctioning voice demo as the minutes to showtime tick down, and Saturday Nightâs Michaels yelling at his stage techs for their inability to meet his lighting and audio demands.
The Walk-and-Talks
Sorkin doesnât lay sole claim to the walk-and-talk, but he does use the device frequently enough that itâs the first thing people parody when skewering his work. (See: this 2014 Late Night With Seth Meyers sketch.) And just as President Bartletâs staff picks up and drops six different conversations as they make their way from one engagement to the next in Sorkinâs The West Wing, Michaels walks around Studio 8H at 30 Rockefeller Plaza in Saturday Night putting out fires one ten-second-long interaction at a time. Intricately choreographed by Reitman and captured via long tracking shots, these on-the-go conversations have a dizzying effect that adds to the movieâs intended feeling of chaos.
The Overreliance on Dialogue Quips
In a famous scene from The Social Network â David Fincherâs 2010 movie about the origins of Facebook written by Sorkin â Mark Zuckerbergâs girlfriend Erica tells the future tech CEO that she canât keep talking to him because she finds it exhausting. âDating you is like dating a StairMaster,â she says. Itâs a great joke that doubles as a good summation of what it feels like to listen to Sorkinâs dialogue at its most indulgent. When it lands â which it does frequently â his ping-pong repartee is his writingâs greatest strength. But when it doesnât, it undercuts dramatic moments and character development by not allowing them adequate space to breathe. Saturday Night has a high hit ratio in this regard. In one scene, Dick Ebersol (Cooper Hoffman) pleads with Michaels to get John Belushi to sign his talent contract before air: âItâs a formality,â Lorne tells him. âTheyâre pretty formal here,â Ebersol replies. Reitman and Kenanâs emphasis on banter is appropriate: Comedy legends like Chevy Chase and Dan Aykroyd should be depicted as quick on their feet. But in some instances, like with Tommy Deweyâs Michael OâDonoghue, the movie could have benefited from pulling back a little. In one scene, he tells SNLâs censor that heâd rather âbutt-fuck cancerâ than make the changes to the script sheâs suggested. Heâs less like a three-dimensional person than a glib vessel for quips and barbs â Deadpool if he were the head writer of SNL.
The Heavy-Handed Metaphors
Saturday Night does not suffer from an excess of subtlety. In its most overt example of symbolism, a set designer builds the showâs stage one brick at a time because, you know, Michaels & Co. built this show from the ground up. In another, a disgruntled Belushi is figure skating and insists he wants to try a triple axel rather than a single axel, because he lived his life to the extreme. Overly precious metaphors like these are a page ripped straight from Sorkinâs playbook. Consider the scene at the end of his Moneyball script, when Brad Pittâs Billy Beane calls himself a failure because his revolutionary approach to baseball roster-building didnât result in a championship in its first year, and his protĂŠgĂŠ Peter Brand (Jonah Hill) shows him a clip from a baseball game to reassure him. In the clip, a baseball player hits a home run without realizing it â thatâs Brandâs way of telling Beane that he is failing to recognize his accomplishment, because Brand tells Beane directly that the player âhit a home run and didnât even realize it.â
The Thinly Characterized Women
Of the seven original SNL cast members depicted in Saturday Night, itâs undeniable that the three women cast members â Gilda Radner (Ella Hunt), Laraine Newman (Emily Fairn), and Jane Curtin (Kim Matula) â get the least to do. Broadly speaking, they get one character trait apiece: Radner is a whimsical oddball, Curtin is concerned sheâs only on the show to be an attractive spokesperson, and Newman is secretly in love with Aykroyd. Itâs indicative of a broader theme in Reitmanâs work. The best women characters in his films (Juno MacGuff in Juno and Mavis Gary in Young Adult) are from scripts written by Diablo Cody. Sorkin, too, has struggled in the past with this limitation. From Donna Moss on The West Wing, who exists at times to be an audience surrogate to whom other characters can explain complex things, to MacKenzie McHale on The Newsroom, an accomplished war journalist who apparently gets flustered using her email, the women in his scripts are rarely well rounded.
Still, the Sorkin female-character trope most evident in Saturday Night is that of the mother/sex-kitten hybrid whose primary purpose is to help broken genius men with their neuroses. Itâs the relationship Sarah Paulsonâs Harriet Hayes has with Albie in Studio 60, itâs the relationship Kate Winsletâs Joanna Hoffman has with Jobs in Steve Jobs, and itâs the relationship Rachel Sennottâs Rosie Shuster has with every man she speaks to in Saturday Night. Shuster was a writer in real life, but Saturday Night never shows her writing. Instead, we see her trying to coax a reluctant Belushi into wearing a bee costume and shave his beard. She does everything but bat her eyes at him and say, âWonât you do it for ⌠me?â
The âVisionary Geniusâ Protagonist
Between Zuckerberg, Jobs, and Albie, Sorkin loves writing flawed masterminds who have a vision only they can see. Saturday Nightâs version of Michaels is cut from this same cloth. Throughout the movie, heâs asked repeatedly to define his vision of the show and fails to articulate it. At one point, in a meeting about integrating product placement to offset some of the budget overages, Michaels asks Ebersol how they can be over budget when âwe donât even know what the show is yet.â Itâs reminiscent of a scene in The Social Network when Zuckerberg tells his business partner Eduardo Saverin (Andrew Garfield) that he doesnât know whether they should start advertising on Facebook because they âdonât even know what it is yet.â That both characters use the same phrasing is likely a coincidence, but that they both express the same sentiment speaks to their shared DNA. Men â be they industry disruptors or screenwriters â are rarely as unprecedented as they think.