data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4b890/4b890b984f38e13f3aa6a6206fcda9d9b5349995" alt="An image from the Thinx ad campaign."
Thinx is a company that makes The ads in question show women wearing black briefs with tank tops or turtlenecks alongside photos of either half of a vagina-looking grapefruit, or a cracked egg meant to reference the unfertilized egg that leads to menstruation. They include the tagline “underwear for women with periods” with the helpful annotation that a period is “the shedding of the uterine lining.” Seems pretty straightforward, but Outfront Media isn’t having it.
Mic reports that Outfront told Thinx CEO Miki Agrawal that the ads “seem to have a bit too much skin” and the egg and grapefruit imagery “seems inappropriate,” regardless of the context. A representative was also concerned that children would see the word “period” and ask their parents what it means. Horrors! Meanwhile, other subway ads that show much more skin have been approved. (And questionable grapefruits, too.)
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/30d06/30d06e8d8a78cf3c1746808cbb95f52a169fa4a1" alt=""
Thinx left “period” in the copy but Outfront said the campaign could not run it as is, implying that it’s inappropriate. Outfront
Update: An MTA spokesperson told the New York Times that while the decision hasn’t been announced yet, the ads will go through. “Of course they will be approved,” said the spokesperson, who asked for anonymity. Their party line is that the ads are still under review, but email screenshots Thinx posted on its Facebook page made it seem like the gatekeepers at Outfront had yet to present the ads to the MTA. We’ll believe they’ve gotten the thumbs-up when Thinx tells us so.